The spectrum of Pakistan's education problems is much wider and deeper than just schooling. It affects all sectors of the education system, ranging from primary and secondary schooling to higher education and vocational training. Higher education remains ineffective in imparting appropriate skills to the large majority of Pakistani graduates who emerge from universities. As a result, most are unable to become productive contributors either in Pakistan, or on the global stage. Vocational education is neglected and its quality remains uneven. Over 75 percent of graduates have some foundational skills, but no marketable skills for employment. Higher and vocational education are primary departure points for Pakistani youth into Pakistan's economy and society. Under-preparation at these levels severely limits national development.
Pakistan does not have the luxury of waiting to reform the education system, nor can it afford to prioritize certain sectors over others. The need of the day is a balance between resource allocation between sectors and tailoring reform plans to each sector's needs and constraints. For example, prioritizing primary education over the large number of young people in need of vocational training may put currently achievable goals out of reach in five years.
The creation of a priori blueprint for reforming the entire education system would be a complex and demanding task that can only be led by major stakeholders, including the government, political leaders and civil society. Stakeholder buy-in is crucial, because the process will require making serious choices about the level of resources to commit to each sector, and choosing what to reform and how. Nonetheless, the following guiding principles can be considered a good starting point.
First, any reform must be systemic, focusing on a defined set of areas for each sector and addressing them simultaneously. Focus areas may include governance, fiscal resources, human resources, curriculum and infrastructure. These areas are crucially interlinked and omitting one is likely to hamper meaningful and sustainable long-term change.
Second, institutions' standards of excellence must be tailored to purpose. A system is ‘excellent’ if it has a variety of t-for-purpose institutions delivering what they are designed for, within their resource constraints. Aiming for system excellence must not impose uniform performance standards on all institutions.
Third, implementation resources must be carefully nurtured and protected. Implementation eventually comes down to people who possess the motivation, skill, experience and resolve to build and maintain reform efforts - promising reforms often fail when one or two key people exit. Therefore, it is important to recognize the dangers of replacing teams before the ground gained in reform has been secured. This is particularly important because of the difficulty in replacing talent in Pakistan and the high learning costs for new participants.
Moving from principles to actual reform blueprints requires serious, system-level reform rather than piecemeal initiatives. This is particularly difficult as the current government has taken notice of highly emotive and visible problems such as the economy, energy and security. Problems falling within these themes—inflation, slow economic growth, energy riots, sectarian violence— are daily news, and the political capital gained from addressing them is far greater than the longer-term payoff from investing in education.